CohortQX

The CohortQX platform

01 · Application understanding

Understand the application as a whole.

CohortQX brings together the documents, facts, inconsistencies and missing evidence a reviewer would otherwise have to find manually.

  • Transcripts, CVs, statements, references and test reports
  • Structured facts connected across documents
  • Missing-document and inconsistency warnings
  • Reference letter validation check
  • Decision-ready overview with direct source access
Application file8 of 8 documents
Applicant 0284Document processing complete
Ready for review
TR
Academic transcript22 modules · GPA and institution extracted
Verified
CV
Curriculum vitae3 roles · 2 projects · activities
Verified
PS
Personal statementMotivation · goals · supporting examples
Reviewed
RL
Reference letters2 referees · relationship and claims checked
Reviewed
TS
Test scoreQuantitative percentile identified
Verified

02 · Academic intelligence

Go beyond a transcript summary.

Interpret grades in context, understand the institution and identify the subject preparation that matters to your programme.

  • Country- and school-specific grade conversion
  • Institution matching, rankings and prestige context
  • Quantitative and economics module classification
  • GPA extraction and calculation
Academic preparationEvidence linked
CONVERTED ACADEMIC BAND 1st Based on programme-approved policy
CONVERSION PATH

How this result was reached

01

Degree, institution and grading scale matched.

02

Final-year and overall results compared.

03

Country-specific conversion rule applied.

04

Boundary and manual-review checks passed.

SUPPORTING TRANSCRIPT EVIDENCE · PAGE 1

Final cumulative average: 86.4 / 100
Degree classification: Highest Honours

03 · Explainability

See the reasoning. Check the source.

Every conclusion is presented with its criteria, interpretation and source evidence, so reviewers can verify rather than merely trust.

  • Criterion and subcriterion-level explanations
  • Source document and page references
  • Warnings, uncertainty and exceptions kept visible
  • Deterministic rules separated from model judgement
4/5
WORK EXPERIENCE

Substantial relevant experience

Two roles provide strong evidence for the programme.

04 · Tailored assessment

Your policy becomes the system.

Map each programme’s standards into documented criteria, conversions and review steps—without forcing the institution into a generic model.

  • Programme-specific criteria and terminology
  • Approved formulas, thresholds and exceptions
  • Versioned changes and governance review
  • Workflow and system integration
Programme configurationDraft version
MSC PROGRAMMEAssessment policy
Version 3.2
⋮⋮A
Academic preparationConversion and standing
Required
⋮⋮Q
Quantitative readinessModule evidence
Required
⋮⋮W
Relevant experienceDuration · level · fit
Weighted
⋮⋮M
Motivation10 subcriteria
Weighted
Approval required before publishing

05 · Human review

AI prepares. People decide.

Reviewers can inspect, correct and override every assessment. Their changes remain visible and survive future processing.

  • Reviewer edits with visible history
  • Warnings and exceptions surfaced for attention
  • Original documents always available
  • Admission decisions remain explicitly human
Reviewer workspaceDraft decision
REVIEWER DECISION
Invite to interview Waitlist Reject Other / refer
REVIEW HISTORY
Decision draftedReviewer · just now
Experience evidence correctedReviewer · 8 min ago
Application processedCohortQX · 12 min ago

See it with your process

Bring a review workflow you use today.

Talk to us ↗